Karen Horney and Her Contribution to Psychology: Literature Review
Karen Horney and Her Contribution to
Psychology: Literature Review
Xenia J. Kozlov
Adler University
Abstract
This paper sets the goal to give a literature review of the academic
legacy of Karen Horney within the topic "Unheard Voices in Psychology."
Roughly, the research of Horney's whole life could be divided into three broad
directions: neo-Freudism, feminine studies, and research on Self. All of them
were reflected in further psychological studies, so the contribution of Karen
Horney into modern psychology cannot be assumed as over evaluated.
Keywords: Karen
Horney, neo-Freudism, feminine psychology, self-psychology.
Introduction
Unheard voices in psychology are an essential
problem of social justice. Informing people about the psychologists who remain
unknown is not a part of our job, but it is part of our worldview.
Considering the merit recognition of those who worked hard for contributing to
the field of psychology and were unfairly forgotten should be viewed as a task
for every socially responsible practitioner. From this point, Karen Horney is
one of those whose writings were underestimated. She actually has started women's psychology
studies and contributed significantly to modern concepts of humanism, self-psychology,
and psychoanalysis, stating that individuals can improve their mental
health (Cherry, 2018).
Karen Horney's academic legacy is multilateral.
First of all, it would be reasonable to mention her personal involvement in her
studies. She started as a physician, is one of the first women who enrolled
medical classes, and got her M.D. Shortly after, family issues impacted her
choice of psychoanalysis: she was looking for help in coping with her parents'
death and husband's illness (Langenderfer, 1999).
In this paper, we will
explore three main directions in Karen Horney's studies. These can be divided into three courses:
neo-Freudism, when Horney objected Freud's view on factors impacting on
personality (the most famous is the rejection of "penis jealousy"), feminine
psychology, which is rooted in Horney's practice as one of the first female psychiatrists, that allowed her to observe and formulate women's specific
problems, and the self-psychology – this one includes the theory of neurosis and
observing narcissism phenomena.
Neo-Freudism
Horney's psychological
research started as classic psychoanalysis studies, but approximately at the
time of rising Nazism and her move to the United States, Horney moved away
from orthodox Freudism. She criticized the main aspects of the Oedipus complex,
concepts of sex and aggression as primarily driving forces of human
personality, and "penis envy" Libido theory (Ingram, 2012). In her book, "New Ways of Psychoanalysis."
(1939)Horney states that the "womb envy" can be observed in men in the same
amounts as "penis envy" can be found in women.
Alfred
Adler's view on individual psychology, which included, among others, socially-oriented approaches, have significantly impacted on Horney's vision (Watts
& Critelli, 1997). Horney shifted focus from sex and jealousy towards social
and cultural aspects of personality. According to Danto (2005), Karen Horney
was one of the most influential psychoanalysts. They introduced the social culture
relativism – the principle regarding the impact of social and cultural factors on
the individual - in classic Freudian theory.
Feminine
Psychology
Pushing off the
chauvinistic tenets of classical Freudism and basing her research on practical
experience, Horney studied women psychology and psychiatry and, in fact, was a
a pioneer in this field. Horney argued that women's psychology had only been
viewed from the men's point of view. She emphasized the role of social
pressure, which dictated women's objectification and fixation on marriage, the
emerging of mistrust in family and conflicts between parents and children, and,
mostly important, in developing of inner conflict. It is theorized that Horney
later switched her attention from feminine psychology to the studies on Self
and never returned back to female issues, but, according to Marcia Westcott,
this question is at least controversial (Westcott, 1986).
Horney's comments about
the impact of cultural factors on gender roles and women's development was
very radical compared to the mainstream view on gender in the first half of 20th
century. Her questioning about the real roots of "true nature" of women's
conformity seems obvious today, and this is a definite sign of Horney's
contribution to gender studies (Smith, 2006).
Self-psychology
Probably, the most
appreciated part of Horney's contribution is her research on Self and the role
of the inner conflict in emerging neurosis. This direction has multiple
relations, both with Horney's contemporary theories, as well as with later
studies (Smith, 2007). According to Horney's approach, the gap between real Self
and ideal Self causes neurotic reactions. Thus, the authentic Self is the source of
inner force in each individual while the ideal Self arises in response to
anxiety, which sprouts from the uncertain environment. This environment,
usually expressed through non-affirming positive feedback from significant others,
also works for alienation of the personality from their real Self. The actual
Self, which is a mixture of strengths and weaknesses, describe a person's
current existence in the world. In her book, "Our Inner Conflicts: A
Constructive Theory of Neurosis" (first published 1945, cited by reissued
edition, 1992), Horney states that Self is mostly a product of environmental
impact, especially the early parent-child relationships (Paris, 1999),
distinguishes 10 neurotic needs which impact defensive mechanisms, and pays
special attention to narcissism as a product of specific social influence
(Horney, 1992). According to Horney,
an individual's behavior is not naturally destructive (and this was a significant
step of the Freudian standpoint). It refers to anxiety and neurotic
conflicts rather than destructive instincts (DeRosis, 1991).
Horney's findings based
on her view of selves and neurosis, gave start to our current understanding of
psychotherapy, for instance, cultural and interpersonal contributions to neurosis,
continued nature of human development, self-realization, and self-motivation.
Heinz Kohut, in a certain way, echoed her view on the interaction between Self and
significant other in his concepts of empathic immersion. We can also see the roots of Horney's ideas
in the attachment theory – the most fascinating, probably, is the notice that
with the lack of attachment, one's behaviors loose flexibility (Smith, 2006). Modern
studies in the theory of attachment point that people who experience the lack of
attachment may suffer from avoidant attachment disorder which is expressed in the lack
of flexibility in behaviors and failure to develop a close relationship (DeGangi,
2017).
Conclusion
Karen Horney was an outstanding personality
who, as noted by Susan Quinn, "had a mind of her own," born a rebel and
continuing to rebel through all her life (Quinn, 1987). Horney's works impacted
Kohut's studies of the Self, Attachment theory, and feminist approaches in
psychology. She developed principles of psychotherapy that are relevant today
(Smith, 2007).
Speaking about unheard voices in psychology, it
is somewhat controversial why a scientist who had contributed to the field so
much stays relatively unknown within full circles of specialists. This proves
that the problem of unheard voices is relevant as ever in our society.
References:
Cherry, K. (2018, December 11th).
Contributions of Karen Horney to Psychology: Why She Disagreed with Freud. Retrieved
from https://www.verywellmind.com/karen-horney-biography-2795539
Danto, E. A. (2005). Freud's Free
Clinics : Psychoanalysis and Social Justice, 1918–1938. New York: Columbia
University Press. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=141357&site=ehost-live
DeGangi, G. A. (2017). Addressing
Attachment and Problems of Intimacy: How to Build Healthy Emotional
Connections. Pediatric Disorders of Regulation in Affect and Behavior (2nd Ed.). Kensington, MD, Academic Press, pp.
57-115.
DeRosis, L. E. (1981). Horney's
theory and narcissism. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 41(4), 337-346. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01258947
Horney, K. (1939). New Ways in
Psychoanalysis. Retrieved from http://www.verlaine.pro.br/txt/horney-new-ways.pdf
Horney, K. (1992). Our Inner Conflicts : A CONSTRUCTIVE THEORY
OF NEUROSIS. (Reissued
Ed.). New York, NY. W. W. Norton & Company.
Ingram, D. H. (2012). Who Was
Karen Horney? Psychiatric Times, 29(3), 22–23. Retrieved from http://www.psychiatrictimes.com/psychotherapy/who-was-karen-horney
Langenderfer, G. (1999). Karen
Horney. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20100709153139/http://www.muskingum.edu/~psych/psycweb/history/horney.htm
Paris, B. J. (1999). Karen Horney's
Vision of the Self. The American Journal of Psychoanalysis (59),
157-166. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/a3e8/84090e1ab763bab0ead9a243247003196e54.pdf
Quinn, S. (1987). A mind of her own: The life of Karen Horney. Lexington, MA.
Plunkett Lake Press.
Smith, W. B. (2007). Karen Horney and Psychotherapy in the 21st Century. Clinical
Social Work Journal, 35(1), 57–66.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10615-006-0060-6
Watts, R. E., Critelli, J. W., (1997). Roots of
contemporary cognitive theories in the individual psychology of Alfred Adler.
Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy 11(3), 147-156. Retrieved from: http://www.liberty.edu/informationservices/ilrc/library/Westkott,
M. (1986). The feminist legacy of Karen Horney. New Haven, CT, U.S.: Yale
University Press.
Comments
Post a Comment